From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chris@colorremedies.com, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Lowmem mode fsck fixes with fsck-tests framework update
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:54:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485276845.12065.1.camel@scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123091359.21390-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6669 bytes --]
Hey Qu.
I was giving your patches a try, again on the very same fs (which saw
however writes in the meantime), from my initial report.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITHOUT patch:
*******************************
# btrfs check /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
checking csums
checking root refs
Checking filesystem on /dev/nbd0
UUID: 326d292d-f97b-43ca-b1e8-c722d3474719
found 7519512838144 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 7330834320
total tree bytes: 10902437888
total fs tree bytes: 2019704832
total extent tree bytes: 1020149760
btree space waste bytes: 925714197
file data blocks allocated: 7509228494848
referenced 7630551511040
0
# btrfs check --mode=lowmem /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
checking extents
ERROR: block group[74117545984 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[239473786880 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[500393050112 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[581997428736 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[626557714432 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[668433645568 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[948680261632 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[982503129088 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[1039411445760 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[1054443831296 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[1190809042944 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[1279392743424 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[1481256206336 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[1620842643456 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[1914511032320 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[3055361720320 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[3216422993920 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[3670615785472 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[3801612288000 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[3828455833600 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[4250973241344 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4261710659584 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1074266112
ERROR: block group[4392707162112 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4558063403008 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4607455526912 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4635372814336 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4640204652544 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[4642352136192 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[4681006841856 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[5063795802112 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[5171169984512 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[5216267141120 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1207959552
ERROR: block group[5290355326976 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[5445511020544 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1074266112
ERROR: block group[6084387405824 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[6104788500480 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[6878956355584 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[6997067956224 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[7702516334592 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: block group[8051482427392 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 1084751872
ERROR: block group[8116980678656 1073741824] used 1073741824 but extent items used 0
ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
Checking filesystem on /dev/nbd0
UUID: 326d292d-f97b-43ca-b1e8-c722d3474719
found 7519512838144 bytes used err is -5
total csum bytes: 7330834320
total tree bytes: 10902437888
total fs tree bytes: 2019704832
total extent tree bytes: 1020149760
btree space waste bytes: 925714197
file data blocks allocated: 7509228494848
referenced 7630551511040
1
=> so the fs would still show the symptoms
Then, with no RW mount to the fs in between, 4.9 with the following of
your patches:
0001-btrfs-progs-lowmem-check-Fix-wrong-block-group-check.patch
0003-btrfs-progs-fsck-Output-verbose-error-when-fsck-foun.patch
0004-btrfs-progs-lowmem-check-Fix-false-alert-in-checking.patch
0005-btrfs-progs-lowmem-check-Fix-extent-item-size-false-.patch
the others were anyway just tests related, AFAICS.
btrfs-progs v4.9 WITH patches:
****************************
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
checking csums
checking root refs
Checking filesystem on /dev/nbd0
UUID: 326d292d-f97b-43ca-b1e8-c722d3474719
found 7519512838144 bytes used, no error found
total csum bytes: 7330834320
total tree bytes: 10902437888
total fs tree bytes: 2019704832
total extent tree bytes: 1020149760
btree space waste bytes: 925714197
file data blocks allocated: 7509228494848
referenced 7630551511040
0
=> bon!
# btrfs check --mode=lowmem /dev/nbd0 ; echo $?
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
ERROR: root 6031 EXTENT_DATA[277 524288] datasum missing
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
Checking filesystem on /dev/nbd0
UUID: 326d292d-f97b-43ca-b1e8-c722d3474719
found 7519512838144 bytes used, error(s) found
total csum bytes: 7330834320
total tree bytes: 10902437888
total fs tree bytes: 2019704832
total extent tree bytes: 1020149760
btree space waste bytes: 925714197
file data blocks allocated: 7509228494848
referenced 7630551511040
1
=> some new errors :-(
Not sure though, whether this is an issue in your patch or a new
problem due to my writes (I did just another round of incremental send
-p/receive)
Any ideas?
Best,
Chris.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5930 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 9:13 [PATCH 0/9] Lowmem mode fsck fixes with fsck-tests framework update Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix wrong block group check when search slot points to slot beyong leaf Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: Add test image for lowmem mode block group false alert Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] btrfs-progs: fsck: Output verbose error when fsck found a bug Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alert in checking data extent pointing to prealloc extent Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix extent item size false alert Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs-progs: tests: Move fsck-tests/015 to fuzz tests Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Make 013 compatible with lowmem mode Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs-progs: fsck: Fix lowmem mode override to allow it skip repair work Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Add new test case for partly written prealloc extent Qu Wenruo
2017-01-23 9:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs-progs: fsck: Fix lowmem mode override to allow it skip repair work Qu Wenruo
2017-01-24 16:54 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2017-01-25 0:44 ` [PATCH 0/9] Lowmem mode fsck fixes with fsck-tests framework update Qu Wenruo
2017-01-25 0:46 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-01-25 4:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-25 4:40 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-01-26 2:50 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-01-26 3:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-26 3:30 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-01-26 23:31 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-01-29 4:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-01-30 3:07 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-02-01 1:06 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-01 22:03 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-02-02 0:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-02 2:12 ` Qu Wenruo
[not found] ` <1486098502.7443.3.camel@lmu.de>
2017-02-03 6:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-02-03 23:01 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2017-02-06 1:25 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485276845.12065.1.camel@scientia.net \
--to=calestyo@scientia.net \
--cc=chris@colorremedies.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).