From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com, jeffm@suse.com,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Separate space_info create/update
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 11:34:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494318859-7555-2-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494318859-7555-1-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com>
Currently the struct space_info creation code is intermixed in the
udpate_space_info function. There are well-defined points at which the we
actually want to create brand-new space_info structs (e.g. during mount of
the filesystem as well as sometimes when adding/initialising new chunks). In
such cases udpate_space_info is called with 0 as the bytes parameter. All of
this makes for spaghetti code.
Fix it by factoring out the creation code in a separate create_space_info
structure. This also allows to simplify the internals. Furthermore it will
make the update_space_info function not fail, allowing to remove error
handling in callers. This will come in a follow up patch.
This bears no functional changes
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index be5477676cc8..e71921d8c610 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3914,15 +3914,57 @@ static const char *alloc_name(u64 flags)
};
}
+static int create_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
+ struct btrfs_space_info **new) {
+
+ struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
+ int i;
+ int ret;
+
+ space_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*space_info), GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!space_info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = percpu_counter_init(&space_info->total_bytes_pinned, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(space_info);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->block_groups[i]);
+ init_rwsem(&space_info->groups_sem);
+ spin_lock_init(&space_info->lock);
+ space_info->flags = flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
+ space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
+ init_waitqueue_head(&space_info->wait);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->ro_bgs);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->tickets);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&space_info->priority_tickets);
+
+ ret = kobject_init_and_add(&space_info->kobj, &space_info_ktype,
+ info->space_info_kobj, "%s",
+ alloc_name(space_info->flags));
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(space_info);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ *new = space_info;
+ list_add_rcu(&space_info->list, &info->space_info);
+ if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
+ info->data_sinfo = space_info;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
u64 total_bytes, u64 bytes_used,
u64 bytes_readonly,
struct btrfs_space_info **space_info)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *found;
- int i;
int factor;
- int ret;
if (flags & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10))
@@ -3946,53 +3988,6 @@ static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags,
*space_info = found;
return 0;
}
- found = kzalloc(sizeof(*found), GFP_NOFS);
- if (!found)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = percpu_counter_init(&found->total_bytes_pinned, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret) {
- kfree(found);
- return ret;
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->block_groups[i]);
- init_rwsem(&found->groups_sem);
- spin_lock_init(&found->lock);
- found->flags = flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
- found->total_bytes = total_bytes;
- found->disk_total = total_bytes * factor;
- found->bytes_used = bytes_used;
- found->disk_used = bytes_used * factor;
- found->bytes_pinned = 0;
- found->bytes_reserved = 0;
- found->bytes_readonly = bytes_readonly;
- found->bytes_may_use = 0;
- found->full = 0;
- found->max_extent_size = 0;
- found->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
- found->chunk_alloc = 0;
- found->flush = 0;
- init_waitqueue_head(&found->wait);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->ro_bgs);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->tickets);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&found->priority_tickets);
-
- ret = kobject_init_and_add(&found->kobj, &space_info_ktype,
- info->space_info_kobj, "%s",
- alloc_name(found->flags));
- if (ret) {
- kfree(found);
- return ret;
- }
-
- *space_info = found;
- list_add_rcu(&found->list, &info->space_info);
- if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
- info->data_sinfo = found;
-
- return ret;
}
static void set_avail_alloc_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
@@ -4495,10 +4490,9 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
if (!space_info) {
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */
}
- BUG_ON(!space_info); /* Logic error */
again:
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
@@ -5763,7 +5757,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_reserve_metadata(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
*/
u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
- trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "orphan", btrfs_ino(inode),
+ trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "orphan", btrfs_ino(inode),
num_bytes, 1);
return btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(src_rsv, dst_rsv, num_bytes, 1);
}
@@ -10153,6 +10147,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
int ret;
+
btrfs_set_log_full_commit(fs_info, trans);
cache = btrfs_create_block_group_cache(fs_info, chunk_offset, size);
@@ -10191,16 +10186,18 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
}
#endif
/*
- * Call to ensure the corresponding space_info object is created and
- * assigned to our block group, but don't update its counters just yet.
- * We want our bg to be added to the rbtree with its ->space_info set.
+ * Ensure the corresponding space_info object is created and
+ * assigned to our block group. We want our bg to be added to the rbtree
+ * with its ->space_info set.
*/
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, 0, 0, 0,
- &cache->space_info);
- if (ret) {
- btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
- btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
- return ret;
+ cache->space_info = __find_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags);
+ if (!cache->space_info) {
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, &cache->space_info);
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
+ btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
+ return ret;
+ }
}
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(fs_info, cache);
@@ -10774,21 +10771,21 @@ int btrfs_init_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
mixed = 1;
flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM;
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
if (ret)
goto out;
if (mixed) {
flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
} else {
flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
if (ret)
goto out;
flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
- ret = update_space_info(fs_info, flags, 0, 0, 0, &space_info);
+ ret = create_space_info(fs_info, flags, &space_info);
}
out:
return ret;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-09 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-09 8:34 [PATCH 0/2] space_info update/creation refactoring Nikolay Borisov
2017-05-09 8:34 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2017-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: Separate space_info create/update Jeff Mahoney
2017-05-09 8:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Refactor update_space_info Nikolay Borisov
2017-05-17 13:50 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-06-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] space_info update/creation refactoring David Sterba
2017-06-01 14:59 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494318859-7555-2-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).