From: ST <smntov@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reasonable amount of snapshots
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:31:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509535904.1662.93.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb1522f7-ffbe-cc5c-8a1d-bb3812b2e0f0@gmx.com>
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 19:17 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> On 2017年11月01日 19:04, ST wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I read in different places that one should keep amount of snapshots low
> > - around 15-20. My question - is this limitation on total number of
> > snapshots on the system or only on related (parent<->child) chain of
> > snapshots?
>
> Independent subvolume doesn't count, and it's filesystem based.
>
> So only snapshots (with source exists, and still shares a lot of trees
> with source) counts.
>
> And if you have multiple btrfs fses, then the count should be based on
> each fs.
>
> > What I want to do is the following: create (and then rotate) last 7
> > daily snapshots (and maybe 4 weekly) for each user in his /home dir.
> > For
> > around 100 users. So if limitation is only on related snapshots then I'm
> > OK since only each 7 (or maybe 7+4) of them are related which is well
> > under the 15-20 limit. However in total there could be 700 snapshots. So
> > what is true?
>
> You're OK since independent subvolumes won't cause too much stress for
> backref walk.
>
> The only thing you may need to consider is to limit the ability to
> reflink data between subvolumes.
> Like cp --reflink or even offline dedupe.
Thank you very much! How can I limit this ability? (I'm on Debian9)
All the best!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-01 11:04 Reasonable amount of snapshots ST
2017-11-01 11:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-01 11:31 ` ST [this message]
2017-11-01 12:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-01 12:13 ` Hans van Kranenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509535904.1662.93.camel@gmail.com \
--to=smntov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).