From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailgw-02.dd24.net ([193.46.215.43]:44493 "EHLO mailgw-02.dd24.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751038AbeCJQ6n (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:58:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1520701119.24363.33.camel@scientia.net> Subject: Re: zerofree btrfs support? From: Christoph Anton Mitterer To: Adam Borowski Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:58:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180310155022.wtdmwiyxu7mxt74s@angband.pl> References: <1520650525.5641.47.camel@scientia.net> <20180310081606.7c2u2dtopijujhbz@angband.pl> <1520691545.24363.10.camel@scientia.net> <20180310193722.2d6b494a@natsu> <20180310155022.wtdmwiyxu7mxt74s@angband.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Since we're on a btrfs mailing list Well... my original question was whether someone could make zerofree support for btrfs (which I think would be best if someone who knows how btrfs really works)... thus I directed the question to this list and not to some of qemu :-) > It works only with scsi and virtio-scsi drivers. Most qemu setups > use > either ide (ouch!) or virtio-blk. Seems my libvirt created VMs use "sata" per default... and it does seem to work with that either in the meantime. Thanks :-) Chris.