* [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller
2018-05-22 9:46 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-05-22 9:46 ` Gu Jinxiang
2018-05-22 10:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-22 16:03 ` David Sterba
2018-05-22 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-22 15:56 ` David Sterba
2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gu Jinxiang @ 2018-05-22 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: nborisov
Function btrfs_exclude_logged_extents may call __exclude_logged_extent
which may fail.
Propagate the failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 2e85e99b5e6f..28fd71579141 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6468,6 +6468,7 @@ int btrfs_exclude_logged_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_key key;
int found_type;
int i;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, MIXED_GROUPS))
return 0;
@@ -6484,10 +6485,14 @@ int btrfs_exclude_logged_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
continue;
key.objectid = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, item);
key.offset = btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(eb, item);
- __exclude_logged_extent(fs_info, key.objectid, key.offset);
+ ret = __exclude_logged_extent(fs_info, key.objectid,
+ key.offset);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
}
- return 0;
+out:
+ return ret;
}
static void
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller
2018-05-22 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-05-22 10:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-22 16:03 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-05-22 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang, linux-btrfs
On 22.05.2018 12:46, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> Function btrfs_exclude_logged_extents may call __exclude_logged_extent
> which may fail.
> Propagate the failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 2e85e99b5e6f..28fd71579141 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -6468,6 +6468,7 @@ int btrfs_exclude_logged_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> struct btrfs_key key;
> int found_type;
> int i;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (!btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, MIXED_GROUPS))
> return 0;
> @@ -6484,10 +6485,14 @@ int btrfs_exclude_logged_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> continue;
> key.objectid = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, item);
> key.offset = btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(eb, item);
> - __exclude_logged_extent(fs_info, key.objectid, key.offset);
> + ret = __exclude_logged_extent(fs_info, key.objectid,
> + key.offset);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller
2018-05-22 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller Gu Jinxiang
2018-05-22 10:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
@ 2018-05-22 16:03 ` David Sterba
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-05-22 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang; +Cc: linux-btrfs, nborisov
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 05:46:51PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> Function btrfs_exclude_logged_extents may call __exclude_logged_extent
> which may fail.
> Propagate the failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The whole group of extent exclusion functions needs to be audited for
proper error handling.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent
2018-05-22 9:46 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent Gu Jinxiang
2018-05-22 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller Gu Jinxiang
@ 2018-05-22 10:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-05-22 15:56 ` David Sterba
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-05-22 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang, linux-btrfs
On 22.05.2018 12:46, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> set_extent_bits may return 0/-EEXIST, so return the result in
> add_excluded_extent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 75cfb80d2551..2e85e99b5e6f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -215,11 +215,16 @@ static int add_excluded_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> u64 start, u64 num_bytes)
> {
> u64 end = start + num_bytes - 1;
> - set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[0],
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[0],
> start, end, EXTENT_UPTODATE);
> - set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[1],
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + ret = set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[1],
> start, end, EXTENT_UPTODATE);
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void free_excluded_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent
2018-05-22 9:46 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent Gu Jinxiang
2018-05-22 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: propagate failures of __exclude_logged_extent to upper caller Gu Jinxiang
2018-05-22 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: handle failures of set_extent_bits in add_excluded_extent Nikolay Borisov
@ 2018-05-22 15:56 ` David Sterba
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-05-22 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Jinxiang; +Cc: linux-btrfs, nborisov
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 05:46:50PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> set_extent_bits may return 0/-EEXIST, so return the result in
> add_excluded_extent.
This is misleading, set_extent_bits can return anything that gets
propagated from the callees, which is 0 and -EEXIST for now but will be
also -ENOMEM eventually. And some callers expect values >= 0 (eg. in
btrfs_get_io_failure_record) , but I haven't examined if this can really
happen.
> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 75cfb80d2551..2e85e99b5e6f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -215,11 +215,16 @@ static int add_excluded_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> u64 start, u64 num_bytes)
> {
> u64 end = start + num_bytes - 1;
> - set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[0],
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[0],
> start, end, EXTENT_UPTODATE);
> - set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[1],
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + ret = set_extent_bits(&fs_info->freed_extents[1],
> start, end, EXTENT_UPTODATE);
> - return 0;
> +out:
The function is short and fairly linear so you don't need to add the
label, 'return ret' would be ok.
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void free_excluded_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread