From: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs: get fs_devices pointer form btrfs_scan_one_device
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:22:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531272178-17471-2-git-send-email-gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531272178-17471-1-git-send-email-gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in
btrfs_scan_one_device, better to make it as a return value.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Changelog:
v3: as comment by robot, use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, and rebase to misc-next.
v2: as comment by Nikolay, use ERR_CAST instead of cast type manually.
fs/btrfs/super.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++++++-------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 78b5d51c7bc7..20e1ee338a95 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -916,11 +916,13 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(const char *options, fmode_t flags,
error = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
- flags, holder, &fs_devices);
+ fs_devices = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name,
+ flags, holder);
kfree(device_name);
- if (error)
+ if (IS_ERR(fs_devices)) {
+ error = PTR_ERR(fs_devices);
goto out;
+ }
}
}
@@ -1537,9 +1539,11 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
return ERR_PTR(error);
}
- error = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type, &fs_devices);
- if (error)
+ fs_devices = btrfs_scan_one_device(device_name, mode, fs_type);
+ if (IS_ERR(fs_devices)) {
+ error = PTR_ERR(fs_devices);
goto error_sec_opts;
+ }
/*
* Setup a dummy root and fs_info for test/set super. This is because
@@ -2220,7 +2224,7 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args *vol;
- struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
int ret = -ENOTTY;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -2232,14 +2236,17 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
switch (cmd) {
case BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV:
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
- &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
+ fs_devices = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
+ &btrfs_root_fs_type);
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(fs_devices);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
- &btrfs_root_fs_type, &fs_devices);
- if (ret)
+ fs_devices = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
+ &btrfs_root_fs_type);
+ if (IS_ERR(fs_devices)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(fs_devices);
break;
+ }
ret = !(fs_devices->num_devices == fs_devices->total_devices);
break;
case BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index af2704de9ff9..6a6321e41f1b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1212,14 +1212,14 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
* and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
* is read via pagecache
*/
-int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
- struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
+struct btrfs_fs_devices *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags,
+ void *holder)
{
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
struct btrfs_device *device;
struct block_device *bdev;
struct page *page;
- int ret = 0;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *ret = NULL;
u64 bytenr;
/*
@@ -1233,19 +1233,19 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, flags, holder);
if (IS_ERR(bdev))
- return PTR_ERR(bdev);
+ return ERR_CAST(bdev);
if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
goto error_bdev_put;
}
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
device = device_list_add(path, disk_super);
if (IS_ERR(device))
- ret = PTR_ERR(device);
+ ret = ERR_CAST(device);
else
- *fs_devices_ret = device->fs_devices;
+ ret = device->fs_devices;
mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 275c31c730cf..d8f0b6f85e35 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
int mirror_num, int async_submit);
int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
fmode_t flags, void *holder);
-int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
- struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret);
+struct btrfs_fs_devices *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags,
+ void *holder);
int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-11 1:22 [PATCH v3 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Gu Jinxiang
2018-07-11 1:22 ` Gu Jinxiang [this message]
2018-07-11 9:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] btrfs: get fs_devices pointer form btrfs_scan_one_device Anand Jain
2018-07-11 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] btrfs: make fs_devices to be a local variable Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531272178-17471-2-git-send-email-gujx@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gujx@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).