From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:50733 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225AbcKQUqa (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:46:30 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald To: Chris Murphy Cc: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" , Martin Steigerwald , Roman Mamedov , Btrfs BTRFS Subject: Re: degraded BTRFS RAID 1 not mountable: open_ctree failed, unable to find block group for 0 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:46:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1557871.YY7DD0Ge7g@merkaba> In-Reply-To: References: <18970348.FUMEOFOSb3@merkaba> <2758726.eYgiA1VjUp@merkaba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 17. November 2016, 12:05:31 CET schrieb Chris Murphy: > I think the wiki should be updated to reflect that raid1 and raid10 > are mostly OK. I think it's grossly misleading to consider either as > green/OK when a single degraded read write mount creates single chunks > that will then prevent a subsequent degraded read write mount. And > also the lack of various notifications of device faultiness I think > make it less than OK also. It's not in the "do not use" category but > it should be in the middle ground status so users can make informed > decisions. I agree – as error reporting I think is indead misleading. Feel free to edit it. Ciao, -- Martin