From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sw=E2mi?= Petaramesh Subject: Re: Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ? Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:30:38 +0200 Message-ID: <15663472.1RTxtZJx8a@tethys> References: <4E64D3D5.7020407@petaramesh.org> <20110905222523.4531abe0@sf.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To: linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110905222523.4531abe0@sf.home> List-ID: On Monday 5 September 2011 22:25:23 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > I've seen similar problem on Ubuntu-11 + Aspire One (8GB of slow "SSD= "). > More specifically half of ubuntu install went very fast and when > disk was ~50% free things suddenly gone slow. I'm just about to give up and definitely quit using BTRFS. My system ha= s become=20 so slow after upgrade Ubuntu Natty =3D> Oneiric Beta, that's it's purel= y and=20 simply unusable (although I'm the kind of old, white-haired, experience= d, used=20 to prehistoric systems, thus very patient, IT guy...) It'a most probable that all of my usage patterns, i.e. read my mail, br= owse=20 the web, etc, definitely do not correspond to what BTRFS was designed f= or.=20 (Sorry for the rant, but this really pisses me off...) So I'm only wonderign whether I reformat my system to ext4 or ZFS, and = whether=20 I do it right now or on thursday... --=20 Sw=E2mi Petaramesh http://petaramesh.org PGP 907= 6E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html