public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Swâmi Petaramesh" <swami@petaramesh.org>
To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Is there a "nossd" option ?
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:13:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586648.BNplRrhkhg@zafu> (raw)

Hi,

Running a 3.19 Ubuntu kernel,

I'm currently budling a RAID-1 BTRFS set for which every underlying device is 
a LUKS-encrypted device itself built out of a bcache device comprised of a 
mechanical HD partition + an SSD cache partition.

Looks like it's working.

BUT I see that BTRFS decides by itself to mount with the "ssd" option as  
bcache makes it think the device is not "rotational".

However I feel that a mechanical HD plus SSD bcache should probably not be 
"SSD-optimized" as the underlying storage is indeed mechanical and bcache 
already manages the SSD part optimization by itself - and I'm afraid the "SSD 
optimization" could actually cause the mechanical storage to end up being much 
more fragmented than it should...

So the question is : Is there a mount option such as "nossd" that I could use 
to inhibit the automatic SSD "choice" that BTRFS makes ?

TIA, kind regards.

-- 
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in

             reply	other threads:[~2015-06-21 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-21 17:13 Swâmi Petaramesh [this message]
2015-06-21 17:31 ` Is there a "nossd" option ? Roman Mamedov
2015-06-21 18:11   ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2015-06-21 18:18     ` Eric Sandeen
2015-06-21 18:22     ` Roman Mamedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1586648.BNplRrhkhg@zafu \
    --to=swami@petaramesh.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox