From: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: convert to add transaction protection for btrfs send
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:59:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15BD028C-7568-4ACF-84D1-CA39092AD285@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F00AAE.6070509@fb.com>
Hi Josef,
[..SNIP..]
>
> On 01/31/2014 11:37 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
>> Hello Josef,
>>
>>>
>
> 2) Remove the per-root rwsem for the commit root and just make one big
> rwsem that covers all commit root switching. This way everybody who
> wants to search with the commit root can just use this semaphore and all
> be safe. It will mean that the inode cache stuff may block longer than
> normal but I don't think that's too big of a deal.
>
I am ok with this fix, I wanted to talk something about protecting searching commit file root, this is really a
problem especially for full send.
I have some ideas about this issue:
#1.don't use commit file root to search.
This will become a nightmare when we are doing full send which will iterate the whole file tree,
at the same time, we snapshot send root, snapshots will be blocked until send finished.
#2. don't allow snapshot if we are sending root.
This may be a little confusing, snapshots are readonly, but users can not snapshot it.
#3. after one iteration, we do check send_root's generation, and make sure it doesn't
change, if it changed, then we restart send again.
I don't know which approach is better,and also snapshot-aware defragment will change
read-only snapshot?
Did you have any better ideas about this issue? Share it with me here.^_^
Thanks,
Wang
>
> Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-29 15:32 [PATCH] Btrfs: convert to add transaction protection for btrfs send Wang Shilong
2014-01-29 15:32 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-29 19:00 ` Josef Bacik
2014-01-30 9:42 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-30 16:08 ` Josef Bacik
2014-01-30 16:20 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-30 16:23 ` Josef Bacik
2014-01-30 16:42 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-31 16:37 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-31 23:40 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-03 21:31 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-05 8:59 ` Wang Shilong [this message]
2014-02-05 14:04 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-05 17:23 ` Wang Shilong
2014-02-05 20:47 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-08 3:06 ` Wang Shilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15BD028C-7568-4ACF-84D1-CA39092AD285@gmail.com \
--to=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).