From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:34845 "EHLO mail-lf0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385AbcHTGCf (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2016 02:02:35 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f93so45817777lfi.2 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 23:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Mixing partitioned and non-partitioned discs in a RAID? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bearcat_=c5=9e=c3=a1ndor?= , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" References: From: Andrei Borzenkov Message-ID: <1690ed69-15d1-6a22-b52c-8060fe77759a@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 09:02:31 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 20.08.2016 07:00, Bearcat Şándor пишет: > I have a btrfs non-raid file system that i'd like to convert to > raid10. This single device has my efi boot partion on it, so it's > partitioned into sda1 and sda2. I have 3 other discs (sdc-sde) that > i'd like to make partition-less systems and then add them to the first > disc (sda) using the steps in the conversion section of the wiki > (https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Conversion). > > My concern in that i'll be mixing a partitioned and partition-less > system. Will that work or will i hose myself? > Assuming all disks are of equal size, you will lose space on non-partitioned disks which is at least equal to your EFI boot partition. So it does not offer any advantages; in general the more uniform configuration, the better.