linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:26:02 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1699614047.45797.1508513162616.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508512259-16867-1-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com>


----- On Oct 20, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Nikolay Borisov nborisov@suse.com wrote:

> Commit addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev stats is
> cleared")
> reworked the way device stats changes are tracked. A new atomic dev_stats_ccnt
> counter was introduced which is incremented every time any of the device stats
> counters are changed. This serves as a flag whether there are any pending stats
> changes. However, this patch only partially implemented the correct memory
> barriers necessary:
> 
> - It only ordered the stores to the counters but not the reads e.g.
> btrfs_run_dev_stats
> - It completely omitted any comments documenting the intended design and how
> the memory barriers pair with each-other
> 
> This patch provides the necessary comments as well as adds a missing smp_rmb in
> btrfs_run_dev_stats. Furthermore since dev_stats_cnt is only a snapshot at best
> there was no point in reading the counter twice - once in btrfs_dev_stats_dirty
> and then again when assigning stats_cnt. Just collapse both reads into 1.
> 
> Fixes: addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev stats is
> cleared")
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 4de498817e8a..b6ab8c53477f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -7084,10 +7084,22 @@ int btrfs_run_dev_stats(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> *trans,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> 	list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
> -		if (!device->dev_stats_valid || !btrfs_dev_stats_dirty(device))
> +		stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt);
> +		if (!device->dev_stats_valid || stats_cnt == 0)
> 			continue;
> 
> -		stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * There is a LOAD-LOAD control dependency between the value of
> +		 * dev_stats_ccnt and updating the on-disk values which requires
> +		 * reading the in-memory counters. Such control dependencies
> +		 * require explicit read memory barriers.
> +		 *
> +		 * This memory barriers pairs with smp_mb__before_atomic in
> +		 * btrfs_dev_stat_inc/btrfs_dev_stat_read_and_reset/btrfs_dev_stat_set

should be:

"This memory barriers pairs with smp_mb__before_atomic in
btrfs_dev_stat_inc/btrfs_dev_stat_set, and with the full
barrier implied by atomic_xchg in
btrfs_dev_stat_read_and_reset"

Thanks,

Mathieu


> +		 */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +
> 		ret = update_dev_stat_item(trans, fs_info, device);
> 		if (!ret)
> 			atomic_sub(stats_cnt, &device->dev_stats_ccnt);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index 6108fdfec67f..c5dd48eb7b3d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_inc(struct btrfs_device
> *dev,
> 				      int index)
> {
> 	atomic_inc(dev->dev_stat_values + index);
> +	/*
> +	 * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores
> +	 * updating dev_stats_ccnt.
> +	 *
> +	 * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats().
> +	 */
> 	smp_mb__before_atomic();
> 	atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt);
> }
> @@ -523,6 +529,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_set(struct btrfs_device
> *dev,
> 				      int index, unsigned long val)
> {
> 	atomic_set(dev->dev_stat_values + index, val);
> +	/*
> +	 * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores
> +	 * updating dev_stats_ccnt.
> +	 *
> +	 * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats().
> +	 */
> 	smp_mb__before_atomic();
> 	atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-20 15:10 [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-20 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: Remove redundant memory barrier Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-30 12:55   ` David Sterba
2017-10-20 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: Remove unused function Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-20 15:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2017-10-24 10:47 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-24 13:24   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1699614047.45797.1508513162616.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).