From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: John Center <jlcenter15@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs scrub failing
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1711801.PU4dV1cMlN@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPgWCbTntO5q1acH+MkF7QsGUv3wWqqDXKmBy6pJiQU0OFO-Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 20:04:43 CET schrieb John Center:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> > John Center posted on Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:41:20 -0500 as excerpted:
> >> If this doesn't resolve the problem, what would you recommend my next
> >> steps should be? I've been hesitant to run too many of the btrfs-tools,
> >> mainly because I don't want to accidentally screw things up & I don't
> >> always know how to interpret the results. (I ran btrfs-debug-tree,
> >> hoping something obvious would show up. Big mistake. 😋)
> >
> > LOLed at that debug-tree remark. Been there (with other tools) myself.
> >
> > Well, I'm hoping someone who had the problem can confirm whether it's
> > fixed in current kernels (scrub is one of those userspace commands that's
> > mostly just a front-end to the kernel code which does the real work, so
> > kernel version is the important thing for scrub). I'm guessing so, and
> > that you'll find the problem gone in 4.3.
> >
> > We'll cross the not-gone bridge if we get to it, but again, if the other
> > people who had the similar problem can confirm whether it disappeared for
> > them with the new kernel, it would help a lot, as there were enough such
> > reports that if it's the same problem and still there for everyone (which
> > I doubt as I expect there'd still be way more posts about it if so, but
> > confirmation's always good), nothing to do but wait for a fix, while if
> > not, and you still have your problem, then it's a different issue and the
> > devs will need to work with you on a fix specific to your problem.
>
> Ok, I'm at the next bridge. :-( I upgraded the kernel to 4.4rc7 from
> the Ubuntu Mainline archive & I just ran the scrub:
>
> john@mariposa:~$ sudo /sbin/btrfs scrub start -BdR /dev/md125p2
> ERROR: scrubbing /dev/md125p2 failed for device id 1: ret=-1, errno=5
> (Input/output error)
> scrub device /dev/md125p2 (id 1) canceled
> scrub started at Fri Jan 1 19:38:21 2016 and was aborted after 00:02:34
> data_extents_scrubbed: 111031
> tree_extents_scrubbed: 104061
> data_bytes_scrubbed: 2549907456
> tree_bytes_scrubbed: 1704935424
> read_errors: 0
> csum_errors: 0
> verify_errors: 0
> no_csum: 1573
> csum_discards: 0
> super_errors: 0
> malloc_errors: 0
> uncorrectable_errors: 0
> unverified_errors: 0
> corrected_errors: 0
> last_physical: 4729667584
>
> I checked dmesg & this appeared:
>
> [11428.983355] BTRFS error (device md125p2): parent transid verify
> failed on 241287168 wanted 33554449 found 17
> [11431.028399] BTRFS error (device md125p2): parent transid verify
> failed on 241287168 wanted 33554449 found 17
>
> Where do I go from here?
These and the other errors point at an issue with the filesystem structure.
As I never had to deal with that, I can only give generic advice:
1) Use latest stable btrfs-progs.
2) Umount the filesystem and run
btrfs check (maybe with -p)
When it finds some errors, proceed with the following steps:
Without --repair or some of the other options that modify things it is read
only.
3) If you can still access all the files, first thing to do is: rsync or
otherwise backup them all to a different location, before attempting anything
to repair the issue.
4) If you can´t access some files, you may try to use btrfs restore for
restoring them.
5) Then, if you made sure you have an up-to-date backup run
btrfs --repair
Also watch out for other guidance you may receive her. My approach is based on
what I would do. I never had the need to repair a BTRFS filesystem so far.
Thanks,
--
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-02 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-31 16:20 btrfs scrub failing John Center
2016-01-01 5:55 ` Duncan
2016-01-01 16:41 ` John Center
2016-01-01 17:05 ` Duncan
2016-01-01 18:31 ` John Center
2016-01-02 1:04 ` John Center
2016-01-02 4:04 ` John Center
2016-01-02 4:49 ` John Center
2016-01-02 10:35 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-01-02 11:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
[not found] ` <CAPgWCbQE4aJEQ_vR2vu_ad1v2dH6A=50iUSGnQgNeA4Qo68iSQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-03 9:57 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-01-01 17:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-01-01 18:20 ` John Center
2016-01-01 19:54 ` Martin Steigerwald
[not found] ` <CAPgWCbTPMqCDx99vBXqFsCAjLzCsnxvCwFQnRfSymbD-_RssMA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPgWCbRZOT-LvECuqgbaHSKWE8mYiO5R9kvk-8BeL-9Lb85fVA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-03 10:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-01-03 22:16 ` John Center
2016-01-03 22:33 ` John Center
2016-01-03 22:43 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1711801.PU4dV1cMlN@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=jlcenter15@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox