* Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3)
@ 2014-05-09 15:41 Abbas
2014-05-09 17:22 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Abbas @ 2014-05-09 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Has anyone else experienced a deadlock while doing an incremental send
/ receive?
# uname -r
3.14.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
# btrfs version
Btrfs v3.14.1
Initial send works well but sending incremental snapshots just HALTS:
# btrfs send -vvvv -p test/snap-2014-05-09-13:29:04
test/snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58 | btrfs receive -vvvv backup/test
At subvol test/snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
At snapshot snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
receiving snapshot snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
uuid=8cde86f7-6ded-5046-a55c-3a0d40e7a2fc, ctransid=0
parent_uuid=1a2a9dc2-c271-524f-bd01-b671da630446, parent_ctransid=0
...
Here's the dmesg:
INFO: task btrfs:16204 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 3.14.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
btrfs D ffffffff8181d240 0 16204 23963 0x00000080
ffff88003c8abc38 0000000000000086 ffff88003c8abbd8 ffff88003c8aa010
0000000000014440 0000000000014440 ffff880004b40250 ffffffff81c13480
ffff88003c8abc48 ffff880036b46960 ffff880037bf5800 ffff88003c8abc68
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81636649>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[<ffffffffa011f235>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x335/0x9e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810b2e50>] ? bit_waitqueue+0xe0/0xe0
[<ffffffffa014fb45>] create_snapshot+0x265/0x280 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0150403>] btrfs_mksubvol+0x153/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa015063c>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x19c/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa01507d8>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x108/0x160 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811d395a>] ? do_filp_open+0x4a/0xa0
[<ffffffffa015728a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x45a/0x950 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8126215d>] ? inode_has_perm+0x2d/0x40
[<ffffffff81262202>] ? file_has_perm+0x92/0xa0
[<ffffffff811d4f53>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x73/0x380
[<ffffffff81263e6f>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x4f/0xf0
[<ffffffff811d5301>] SyS_ioctl+0xa1/0xb0
[<ffffffff81642de9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3)
2014-05-09 15:41 Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3) Abbas
@ 2014-05-09 17:22 ` Josef Bacik
2014-05-10 8:04 ` Chris Samuel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2014-05-09 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abbas, linux-btrfs
On 05/09/2014 11:41 AM, Abbas wrote:
> Has anyone else experienced a deadlock while doing an incremental send
> / receive?
>
> # uname -r
> 3.14.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
>
> # btrfs version
> Btrfs v3.14.1
>
> Initial send works well but sending incremental snapshots just HALTS:
>
> # btrfs send -vvvv -p test/snap-2014-05-09-13:29:04
> test/snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58 | btrfs receive -vvvv backup/test
> At subvol test/snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
> At snapshot snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
> receiving snapshot snap-2014-05-09-13:32:58
> uuid=8cde86f7-6ded-5046-a55c-3a0d40e7a2fc, ctransid=0
> parent_uuid=1a2a9dc2-c271-524f-bd01-b671da630446, parent_ctransid=0
> ...
>
Known problem, fixed in 3.15-rc1. Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3)
2014-05-09 17:22 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2014-05-10 8:04 ` Chris Samuel
2014-05-12 15:22 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Samuel @ 2014-05-10 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Josef Bacik, Abbas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Josef,
On Fri, 9 May 2014 01:22:27 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
> Known problem, fixed in 3.15-rc1. Thanks,
Is the fix suitable for -stable too?
All the best,
Chris
- --
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBU23dko1yjaOTJg85AQLPwggAw6zkv1svCb5PToUiwhjwArArlaa/hLjR
n0YgbWpfACpvL0iDrbbEKwIn6cBBOwe/wm5vSF/JoAmgRk8UWkxZrsItjBXt9XjR
Z1O/SJFUjJILxbiKNx4qjEHVKNZfBuPb5fBkcU9iRUzeAXzJUGfC5oWBx29fi187
7G+gJ/axApMdtbNkVyAzRdoS8ehDJgpb95dhxmuSv30d9sYvHlt6k+Ye6ulTO4V2
q2XUQoxTxs5HRACWToZiB5T89GQgJSppLxvRCYlHIYxOpjHvOQDkVvHnIHhVtJhl
ko0TwiQwXNVxwQ825y5T07vhlifWlRx0QHysoqBWP4Qwlfdf1cyjtw==
=xkLU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3)
2014-05-10 8:04 ` Chris Samuel
@ 2014-05-12 15:22 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2014-05-12 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Samuel, linux-btrfs; +Cc: Abbas
On 05/10/2014 04:04 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Josef,
>
> On Fri, 9 May 2014 01:22:27 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> Known problem, fixed in 3.15-rc1. Thanks,
>
> Is the fix suitable for -stable too?
>
Unfortunately no, it's too big. I had thought about shoving it back but
it's simply too complicated and has a lot of other patches that go along
with it to fix other things. Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-12 15:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-09 15:41 Sending incremental backup causes deadlock (3.14.3) Abbas
2014-05-09 17:22 ` Josef Bacik
2014-05-10 8:04 ` Chris Samuel
2014-05-12 15:22 ` Josef Bacik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).