From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34463 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752572Ab3HCRao (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Aug 2013 13:30:44 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5few-0001C1-HC for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 19:30:30 +0200 Received: from host-091-097-227-150.ewe-ip-backbone.de ([91.97.227.150]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 19:30:30 +0200 Received: from hurikhan77+btrfs by host-091-097-227-150.ewe-ip-backbone.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 19:30:30 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Kai Krakow Subject: Re: Is the checkpoint interval adjustable? Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 19:28:35 +0200 Message-ID: <17rvca-hju.ln1@hurikhan.ath.cx> References: <20130731200229.221580@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mike Audia schrieb: > I believe 30 sec is the default for the checkpoint interval. Is this > adjustable? -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Just curious: What would be the benefit of increasing the checkpoint interval? As far as I understood it would not decrease write load on the drives because it will only update a few pointers and probably increase the generation number... Greetings, Kai