From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from csamuel.org ([74.50.50.137]:57018 "EHLO csamuel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751950AbaHDKYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:24:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by csamuel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9FA4003F for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:24:49 +1000 (EST) Received: from csamuel.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (csamuel.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 16047-04 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:24:49 +1000 (EST) Received: from quad.localnet (2001-44b8-41dd-d500-9ddd-740d-de8b-0d3a.static.ipv6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:41dd:d500:9ddd:740d:de8b:d3a]) by csamuel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60B6640030 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:24:49 +1000 (EST) From: Chris Samuel To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ENOSPC with mkdir and rename Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 20:24:46 +1000 Message-ID: <1875052.8GFlAMfPzL@quad> In-Reply-To: References: <17833067.mzxAL4oqZq@quad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:56:46 AM Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Which doesn't protect the *average* user from running into issues like this. No, but they need to be aware of it. > Just because it has been discussed, doesn't mean nothing can/should be done > about it Indeed, and a lot of work has been done over the years on it and it's a lot better than it used to be. :-) cheers, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC