From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: behavior of BTRFS in relation to inodes when moving/copying files between filesystems
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:11:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1965511.ndjfqEXTD8@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11290984.HMVNobY9No@merkaba>
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 12:39:12 CET schrieben Sie:
> Hi!
>
> With BTRFS to XFS/Ext4 the inode number of the target file stays the same in
> with both cp and mv case (/mnt/zeit is a freshly created XFS in this example):
>
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> 6609270 foo
> 99 /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> cp foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> 6609270 8 foo
> 99 /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> cp -p foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> 6609270 foo
> 99 /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> mv foo /mnt/zeit/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -lid /mnt/zeit/moo
> 99 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:28 /mnt/zeit/moo
>
>
> With BTRFS as target filesystem however in the mv case I get a new inode:
>
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /home/moo
> 6609289 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 foo
> 16476276 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 /home/moo
> merkaba:~> cp foo /home/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /home/moo
> 6609289 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 foo
> 16476276 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 /home/moo
> merkaba:~> cp -p foo /home/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -li foo /home/moo
> 6609289 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 foo
> 16476276 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 /home/moo
> merkaba:~> mv foo /home/moo
> merkaba:~> ls -li /home/moo
> 16476280 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6 Okt 13 12:34 /home/moo
>
>
> Is this intentional and/or somehow related to the copy on write specifics of
> the filesystem?
>
> I think even with COW it can just overwrite the existing file instead of
> removing the old one and creating a new one – but it wouldn´t give much of a
> benefit unless the target file is nocow.
>
> (Also I thought only certain other utilities had supercow powers, but well
> BTRFS seems to have them as well :)
Anyone any idea?
Thanks,
--
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-31 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 10:39 behavior of BTRFS in relation to inodes when moving/copying files between filesystems Martin Steigerwald
2015-10-31 11:11 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1965511.ndjfqEXTD8@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox