From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 22:27:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a2b1d3b-6fdd-8940-450b-c8fc3856616f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ca26c1c-3fc2-5673-5443-e543cf23a1b5@suse.com>
On 10/26/2018 08:21 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 24.10.2018 07:31, Anand Jain wrote:
>> This patch adds cli
>> btrfs device forget [dev]
>> to remove the given device structure in the kernel if the device
>> is unmounted. If no argument is given it shall remove all stale
>> (device which are not mounted) from the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> cmds-device.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> ioctl.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
>> index 2a05f70a76a9..c2a2b7f304b8 100644
>> --- a/cmds-device.c
>> +++ b/cmds-device.c
>> @@ -254,10 +254,32 @@ static int cmd_device_delete(int argc, char **argv)
>> return _cmd_device_remove(argc, argv, cmd_device_delete_usage);
>> }
>>
>> +static int btrfs_forget_devices(char *path)
>> +{
>> + struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args args;
>> + int ret;
>> + int fd;
>> +
>> + fd = open("/dev/btrfs-control", O_RDWR);
>> + if (fd < 0)
>> + return -errno;
>> +
>> + memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
>> + if (path)
>> + strncpy_null(args.name, path);
>> + ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV, &args);
>> + if (ret)
>> + ret = -errno;
>> + close(fd);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const char * const cmd_device_scan_usage[] = {
>> - "btrfs device scan [(-d|--all-devices)|<device> [<device>...]]",
>> - "Scan devices for a btrfs filesystem",
>> + "btrfs device scan [(-d|--all-devices)|(-u|--forget)|<device> "\
>> + "[<device>...]]",
>> + "Scan or forget (deregister) devices for a btrfs filesystem",
>> " -d|--all-devices (deprecated)",
>> + " -u|--forget [<device> ..]",
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> @@ -267,32 +289,45 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(int argc, char **argv)
>> int devstart;
>> int all = 0;
>> int ret = 0;
>> + int forget = 0;
>>
>> optind = 0;
>> while (1) {
>> int c;
>> static const struct option long_options[] = {
>> { "all-devices", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>> + { "forget", no_argument, NULL, 'u'},
>> { NULL, 0, NULL, 0}
>> };
>>
>> - c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "d", long_options, NULL);
>> + c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "du", long_options, NULL);
>> if (c < 0)
>> break;
>> switch (c) {
>> case 'd':
>> all = 1;
>> break;
>> + case 'u':
>> + forget = 1;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> usage(cmd_device_scan_usage);
>> }
>> }
>> devstart = optind;
>>
>> + if (all && forget)
>> + usage(cmd_device_scan_usage);
>> +
>> if (all && check_argc_max(argc - optind, 1))
>> usage(cmd_device_scan_usage);
>>
>> if (all || argc - optind == 0) {
>> + if (forget) {
>> + ret = btrfs_forget_devices(NULL);
>> + error_on(ret, "error %d while running forget", ret);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> nit: I would prefer to also have an if () {} else {} construct here,
> similar to what you do below.
Will fix.
Also, I think I can use sterror() instead of ret, in the error_on().
Fixed both of these in v11.
Thanks, Anand
>> printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
>> ret = btrfs_scan_devices();
>> error_on(ret, "error %d while scanning", ret);
>> @@ -315,11 +350,19 @@ static int cmd_device_scan(int argc, char **argv)
>> ret = 1;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '%s'\n", path);
>> - if (btrfs_register_one_device(path) != 0) {
>> - ret = 1;
>> - free(path);
>> - goto out;
>> + if (forget) {
>> + ret = btrfs_forget_devices(path);
>> + if (ret)
>> + error("Can't forget '%s': %s",
>> + path, strerror(-ret));
>> + } else {
>> + printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '%s'\n",
>> + path);
>> + if (btrfs_register_one_device(path) != 0) {
>> + ret = 1;
>> + free(path);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> }
>> free(path);
>> }
>> diff --git a/ioctl.h b/ioctl.h
>> index 709e996f401c..e27d80e09392 100644
>> --- a/ioctl.h
>> +++ b/ioctl.h
>> @@ -721,6 +721,8 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code err_code)
>> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>> #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
>> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
>> + struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>> /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
>> * use by applications that know how to avoid the
>> * resulting deadlocks
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 4:31 [PATCH v10] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
2018-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-10-26 12:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-26 14:27 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH] fstests: btrfs use forget if not reload Anand Jain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-14 9:12 [PATCH RESEND v11] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-11-14 9:12 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-10-26 14:27 [PATCH v11] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-10-26 14:27 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-10-26 14:36 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-12 4:06 [PATCH v9] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-10-12 4:06 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-10-12 9:03 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-24 4:31 ` Anand Jain
2018-08-06 1:09 [PATCH RESEND v8] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-08-06 1:09 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-07-27 0:25 [PATCH v8] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-07-27 0:25 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-07-26 11:32 [PATCH RESEND v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a2b1d3b-6fdd-8940-450b-c8fc3856616f@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).