From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: waxhead@dirtcellar.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unsolvable technical issues?
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:48:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c1b0945-81b1-ac6f-2f16-2527ca382d9f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b255d0fb-5cee-36c5-d49f-5f014d20e518@dirtcellar.net>
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
> According to this:
>
> https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
> Page 4 , section 1.2
>
> It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
> never be resolved.
> Could someone shed some light on exactly what these technical issues
> might be?! What are BTRFS biggest technical problems?
That's a question that needs to be directed at the author of the statement.
>
> If you forget about the "RAID"5/6 like features then the only annoyances
> that I have with BTRFS so far is...
>
> 1. Lack of per subvolume "RAID" levels
> 2. Lack of not using the deviceid to re-discover and re-add dropped devices
>
> And that's about it really...
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 23:13 unsolvable technical issues? waxhead
2018-06-22 2:39 ` Chris Murphy
2018-06-27 18:50 ` waxhead
2018-06-28 14:46 ` Adam Borowski
2018-06-22 5:48 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2018-06-23 22:01 ` waxhead
2018-06-24 3:55 ` Jukka Larja
2018-06-24 8:41 ` waxhead
2018-06-24 15:06 ` Ferry Toth
2018-06-23 5:11 ` Duncan
2018-06-24 20:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2018-06-25 11:26 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-06-30 3:22 ` Duncan
2018-06-30 5:32 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-07-02 11:49 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-07-03 7:35 ` Duncan
2018-07-03 11:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-07-02 11:44 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-06-25 14:20 ` David Sterba
2018-06-25 13:36 ` David Sterba
2018-06-25 16:43 ` waxhead
2018-06-25 16:54 ` Hugo Mills
2018-06-30 3:59 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c1b0945-81b1-ac6f-2f16-2527ca382d9f@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=waxhead@dirtcellar.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).