From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Deprecate unused super block member, log_root_transid
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:45:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ceba3fb-f84a-7b5d-0fed-f06997806b74@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9584982b-ac47-1b99-cb6f-7c0c68804b94@suse.com>
On 2018/10/12 下午2:52, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 12.10.2018 09:37, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> The member log_root_transid is never used.
>> It's always kept untouched even when updating log tree root.
>>
>> And populating it without introducing new incompat flags could easily
>> cause back-compatibility problems.
>> So just mark it unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> changelog:
>> v2:
>> Remove the redundant comment.
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> index 53af9f5253f4..7adf5f4dcda4 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> @@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ struct btrfs_super_block {
>> __le64 chunk_root;
>> __le64 log_root;
>>
>> - /* this will help find the new super based on the log root */
>> - __le64 log_root_transid;
>> + __le64 __unused_log_root_transid;
>
> why do you keep insisting on having "log_root_transid" in the name of
> this member? It was never used on-disk so for all intents and purposes
> log_root_transid doesn't mean anything? No need to resend, I'm sure
> David will change it on commit, nut I'm just curious.
We have a similar case, leaf_size.
Although it differs from this case and it's still used, I prefer to have
something showing that we at least planned to use this member.
Just in case one day we tries to use it again.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>
>> __le64 total_bytes;
>> __le64 bytes_used;
>> __le64 root_dir_objectid;
>> @@ -2317,8 +2316,6 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_chunk_root_level, struct btrfs_super_block,
>> chunk_root_level, 8);
>> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root, struct btrfs_super_block,
>> log_root, 64);
>> -BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root_transid, struct btrfs_super_block,
>> - log_root_transid, 64);
>> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_log_root_level, struct btrfs_super_block,
>> log_root_level, 8);
>> BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(super_total_bytes, struct btrfs_super_block,
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 6:37 [PATCH v2] btrfs: Deprecate unused super block member, log_root_transid Qu Wenruo
2018-10-12 6:52 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-10-12 8:45 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ceba3fb-f84a-7b5d-0fed-f06997806b74@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).