From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C412C2D0C0 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287E221655 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726549AbfLUMUB (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Dec 2019 07:20:01 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:33353 "EHLO relay6-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726098AbfLUMUB (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Dec 2019 07:20:01 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 88.191.131.7 Received: from [192.168.1.155] (unknown [88.191.131.7]) (Authenticated sender: swami@petaramesh.org) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6282DC0005; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Kernel 5.4 - BTRFS FS shows full with about 600 GB Free ? To: Qu Wenruo , "'linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org'" References: <8bd55f28-2176-89f7-bd53-4992ccd53f42@petaramesh.org> <81dec38b-ec8e-382e-7dfe-cb331f418ffa@gmx.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sw=c3=a2mi_Petaramesh?= Message-ID: <1ef1129f-e44b-18ca-9237-29bc52760972@petaramesh.org> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:19:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <81dec38b-ec8e-382e-7dfe-cb331f418ffa@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Le 21/12/2019 à 13:00, Qu Wenruo a écrit : > Running a fsck is always a good behavior, although in this case, it > shouldn't cause any corruption. Actually looks good... root@moksha:~# btrfs check /dev/mapper/luks-xxxxxxxxxxxxx Opening filesystem to check... Checking filesystem on /dev/mapper/luks-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx UUID: yyyyyyyyyy [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents [3/7] checking free space cache [4/7] checking fs roots [5/7] checking only csums items (without verifying data) [6/7] checking root refs [7/7] checking quota groups skipped (not enabled on this FS) found 1306090934272 bytes used, no error found total csum bytes: 1267957652 total tree bytes: 7383269376 total fs tree bytes: 5703942144 total extent tree bytes: 282771456 btree space waste bytes: 1153433142 file data blocks allocated: 1329687621632  referenced 1430556405760 Kind regards.