From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: btrfs_tree_lock & trylock Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:17:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20080908171742.GB19117@infradead.org> References: <20080908135414.GG26079@one.firstfloor.org> <1220882551.8537.5.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080908142052.GK26079@one.firstfloor.org> <20080908080751.3d29fd61@extreme> <20080908154714.GM26079@one.firstfloor.org> <20080908085054.21acbe77@extreme> <1220889313.8537.50.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <48C54F12.3040702@hp.com> <1220890832.8537.63.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080908094942.5d6136e7@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Mason , jim owens , Andi Kleen , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080908094942.5d6136e7@extreme> List-ID: On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:49:42AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Not to mention the problem that developers seem to have faster machines than > average user, but slower than the enterprise and future generation CPU's. > So any tuning value seems to get out of date fast. So where do my fellow developers get these fast systems from? :)