From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [DEBUG PATCH] for anybody who gets a panic due to ENOSPC Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:12:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20081119171243.GB16041@unused.rdu.redhat.com> References: <4922214A.5090904@cs.drexel.edu> <20081118163007.GA1425@unused.rdu.redhat.com> <20081119164535.GA22904@tux64-01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Trager Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081119164535.GA22904@tux64-01> List-ID: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:45:35AM -0500, Lee Trager wrote: > Sorry it took so long to reply it took awhile to run this test. It > didn't cause a kernel panic for about 8 hours. df says only 623M of the > available 7539M are used. Anyway this is with the latest checkin by Chris Mason with the patch you sent me. > > Also since you said you cann't reproduce this I thought it might be > helpful to know the environment I'm doing testing on. I have been > running bonnie++ on xubuntu 8.10 fully updated on vmware 6.5. No vmware > tools are instead except for the mouse and video xorg drivers which come by > default with ubuntu. I have two 8G prealloced virtual drives. The first > one is where the xubuntu install is using ext2 for /boot and / and has a > 512M swap partition. The second one is where I do all of the btrfs testing. > I have it partitioned because I was experimenting with booting with btrfs > as root so the partition btrfs is on has 7539M. The VM has 512M of RAM > dedicated to it and is using one core of my Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 > running at 2.2GHz. > > Lee Ok this is almost everything I need, I just need a few more lines of the debug output, so all of this plus lets say the last 100 lines, that should be everything I need. Or if you have full logs that you can post somewhere that would be great and I can filter through them myself. Thanks much for testing this stuff for me, Josef