From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: Btrfs trees for linux-next
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:55:22 +1100
Message-ID: <20081211165522.1260b29d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <1227183484.6161.17.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
	<1228962896.21376.11.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
	<20081211141436.030c2d65.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20081210200604.8e190b0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Thu__11_Dec_2008_16_55_22_+1100_bs7Dz0PRZd=V/UQs"
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081210200604.8e190b0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

--Signature=_Thu__11_Dec_2008_16_55_22_+1100_bs7Dz0PRZd=V/UQs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:06:04 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org=
> wrote:
>
> I'd prefer that it go into linux-next in the usual fashion.  But the
> first step is review..

OK, I wasn't sure where it was up to (not being a file system person).

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

--Signature=_Thu__11_Dec_2008_16_55_22_+1100_bs7Dz0PRZd=V/UQs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklAq0oACgkQjjKRsyhoI8xT1ACcDDRINw3P97JhUsSSJ8YY2mVW
FmwAoJhDv5S0qNG476Tuhx5ZqzqZ9mKJ
=blx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__11_Dec_2008_16_55_22_+1100_bs7Dz0PRZd=V/UQs--