From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Samuel Subject: btrfs and swap files on SSD's ? Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:10:22 +1100 Message-ID: <200901171110.22803.chris@csamuel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4542476.TjQD5k0IWE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 To: "linux-btrfs" Return-path: List-ID: --nextPart4542476.TjQD5k0IWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi folks, Someone on the OpenMoko community list commented recently about having crea= ted=20 a swap file on the SD card of their OpenMoko Neo phone and said that they'd= =20 been lazy as they'd not made a swap partition. My thought was that with an SSD aware filesystem like btrfs a swapfile woul= d=20 actually be a smarter move than a swap partition because it lets the=20 filesystem try and even the wear generated by access to it which a swap=20 partition will not have the freedom to do. To me that makes logical sense but given the complexity of the kernel and=20 btrfs is it a fair comment to make and, also, would that be the case with=20 btrfs at present ? cheers! Chris =2D-=20 Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. =46or more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --nextPart4542476.TjQD5k0IWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUASXEh7o1yjaOTJg85AQIIIwgAj9S769RqZgmVDnpcaQL7/4I4hc1myl+d 0DnAd4gFSLK5YD4ezIViTqr2W7nEIQcBhp554147G4rczCnjAmf4h5ykihZK8W3Z +sYWLCS7BOxGNEdfxC6iLF5ojo0a5RfsGMwl9vHGNwS7HO1V9UNmrzwUJJsKd0oh YwUDqQvTnMe0d0LPF/q8ytOxB3IMVc+/txh9LEzGdN3ez1+P8U/RGi2bHy0TEmq3 +/VQZs/A/U+oCjXEbfrhY9KGIMsJwPCcNEmZkb4FtbFRHE4YRnSuWA06FksNCM0u vBR1tCU9pxnX1tK9qUNghY1hEvEReC5mgJyKqRKO0HhatZogrzdM+A== =gJSD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4542476.TjQD5k0IWE--