From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:15:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20090120101503.GC17377@alice>
References: <20090113142147.GE16333@alice> <1231857643.29164.28.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20090113144307.GF16333@alice> <20090118174035.GG1944@ucw.cz> <20090120063150.GC5854@alice> <20090120101119.GB10158@disturbed>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090120101119.GB10158@disturbed>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

* Dave Chinner (david@fromorbit.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz) wrote:
> > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > > production' and should survive it...
> > 
> > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of 
> > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
> 
> Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set?

So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are
interested in bugreports i can send you some.

Greetings, Eric