From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: "sparx, India" <sparx.mailing.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Project idea regarding transparency for distributed systems to be incorporated in the btrfs design
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:53:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090812185325.GB4652@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce8c6160908082359u5dd1df12gee1e3066aae6d3db@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 12:29:23PM +0530, sparx, India wrote:
> Hi,
> We are a group of four undergraduate students studying in final year
> completing our computer engineering course from the University of
> Pune, India.
>
> We would like to do an operating system related project over a period
> of 6 months.
> We have studied and understood the design of Btrfs.
>
> We came across this paper presented in Fast '07 on transparent file
> systems in distributed networks. (TFS)
> The paper basically suggests some design changes in a regular file
> system so as to support (and minimize) the efforts of contributory
> applications for storage resources in a distributed system. This would
> enable greater resource contribution without affecting local
> performance ( Storage contribution can increase upto 40% in corporate
> networks)
>
> To support transparent memory allocation to a shared pool efficiently
> a file sytem should:
> 1.Allocate most blocks in a given region
> 2.View storage media as a series of chunks
> 3.Some replicative power of its own.
> However the TFS design does not interfere with a file systems own
> allocation policy.
>
> We could not find any article/information which specifically mentions
> that Btrfs handles memory allocation in distributed systems
> transparently.
>
> We would like to ask your suggestions on the following points:
>
> 1. Are we correct in our assumption that Btrfs does not handle
> transparent allocation as yet or have we missed something?
I'm not sure I fully understand the concept of transparent allocation.
Could you please describet his in more detail?
> 2. Would the Btrfs community appreciate this contribution to the
> file system?(i.e. do you think it is worth our investing our time and
> effort in this and that it contributes positively to btrfs?)
We're always interested in btrfs contributions ;) Thanks for taking the
time to read about the FS and propose this.
-chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-09 6:59 Project idea regarding transparency for distributed systems to be incorporated in the btrfs design sparx, India
2009-08-12 18:53 ` Chris Mason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090812185325.GB4652@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparx.mailing.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox