From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Bacik Subject: Re: btrfs failing fsx-linux Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:29:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20090902172935.GA15846@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090818172641.GC30325@wotan.suse.de> <20090818175950.GA2348@localhost.localdomain> <20090902171450.GF28052@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Josef Bacik , Chris Mason , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090902171450.GF28052@wotan.suse.de> List-ID: On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous > > > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree. > > > > > > This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion patch > > > unfortunately, though it does seem pretty stable so I will probably just > > > send it out anyway. > > > > > > Anyway, just a head's up. Oh, the way I reproduce is to create btrfs > > > on 1GB rd, run 4 instances of fsx-linux on different files in the root > > > directory, and run `while true ; do sync ; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; > > > done` at the same time. > > > > > > > Nick, > > > > I'll take a look at this later today and see what I can come up with. Thanks > > for reporting it. > > Any progress with this? Were you able to reproduce? > Err sorry no, I got distracted with my -ENOSPC stuff, it's taking longer than I expected it to. I hope to wrap it up today and take a look at this next. I was able to reproduce the problem on the experimental branch of Chris's tree, so it's not something that has been fixed yet. Thanks, Josef