From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>,
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ENOSPC at 94% full -- and causing BUGs elsewhere?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:31:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013103145.GC8830@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091012140935.GA8550@vlad.carfax.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:09:35PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:06:30AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:55:32PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > > I've just had the following on my home server. I believe that it's
> > > > btrfs that's responsible, as the machine wasn't doing much other than
> > > > reading/writing on a btrfs filesystem. The process that was doing so
> > > > is now stuck in D+ state, and can't be killed. The timing of the oops
> > > > at the end is also suggestive of being involved in the same incident.
> > > > This is the only btrfs filesystem on the machine.
> > >
> > > Patches have gone to Linus to fix the enospc problems. You can try running the
> > > enospc branch of Chris's git tree and it should behave better for you. Thanks,
> >
> > The right tree for this is the master branch of btrfs-unstable for
> > 2.6.31.
>
> Thanks, Josef and Chris. I've now found the time to check out and
> build the btrfs-unstable tree, and it is indeed handling the ENOSPC
> condition much more cleanly.
>
> However, it seems to have got into a position where I have lots of
> free space reported by df (over 10% of the size of the volume -- 185
> GiB free of 1474 GiB total), but still refuses to write anything to
> the filesystem. Do you have any suggestions for what I could try?
You've probably got most of that 10GB free allocated as metadata. You
could try btrfs-vol -b.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-03 12:21 ENOSPC at 94% full -- and causing BUGs elsewhere? Hugo Mills
2009-10-03 21:55 ` Josef Bacik
[not found] ` <20091004120630.GA19916@think>
2009-10-12 14:09 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 10:31 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-10-13 14:50 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 14:58 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-10-13 16:09 ` Hugo Mills
2009-10-13 23:19 ` Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013103145.GC8830@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox