From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: "John Dong" <jdong@ubuntu.com>, "jim owens" <jowens@hp.com>,
"Pär Andersson" <paran@lysator.liu.se>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mass-Hardlinking Oops
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:03:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013200316.GC7850@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD4BCC7.3060204@oracle.com>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
>
> >>> this thread. I get EMLINK when trying to create more than 311 (not 272)
> >>> links in a directory
> >>
> >> what real-world application uses and needs this many hard links?
> >
> > I don't think that's a good counterargument for why this is not a bug.
>
> I strongly agree. Our ignorance of users operating inside existing
> limits of existing file systems shouldn't justify tightening those limits.
>
> Sure, this is a weird corner case. But given how early btrfs is in the
> deployment stage, it seems worth changing the format to get rid of this
> risk of teaching people to question their expectation that btrfs will
> just work in environments that previous linux file systems worked in.
This hasn't been at the top of my list for a while, I remember a bunch
of planning sessions where you weren't worried about it ;)
But, we can look at ways to resolve it in the future. My big concern
right now is the enospc support, but there is room to update this
without forcing a full format change.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-01 13:16 Mass-Hardlinking Oops Raskin Michael
2009-08-03 14:57 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 15:00 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-08-03 20:01 ` Mikhail Raskin
2009-10-11 15:05 ` Pär Andersson
2009-10-11 22:43 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-10-12 8:07 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-10-12 12:47 ` Chris Mason
2009-10-13 7:07 ` Florian Weimer
2009-10-13 7:28 ` Yan, Zheng
2009-10-14 0:29 ` Matteo Frigo
2009-10-15 17:55 ` Tracy Reed
2009-10-15 18:27 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-10-15 19:15 ` Oystein Viggen
2009-10-16 22:17 ` Pär Andersson
2009-10-12 16:16 ` jim owens
2009-10-12 17:09 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2009-10-12 18:07 ` jim owens
2009-10-12 17:42 ` John Dong
2009-10-12 18:17 ` jim owens
2009-10-12 20:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-10-12 21:51 ` berk walker
2009-10-13 0:31 ` Claudio Martins
2009-10-13 3:42 ` Anthony Roberts
2009-10-13 9:08 ` Brian Brunswick
2009-10-13 17:45 ` Zach Brown
2009-10-13 20:03 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-10-13 20:55 ` Zach Brown
2009-10-12 20:50 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013200316.GC7850@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jdong@ubuntu.com \
--cc=jowens@hp.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paran@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox