From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Dongyang Subject: [PATCH]don't call btrfs_release_path in btrfs_update_root and btrfs_del_root Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:33:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20091106143301.GB5451@Archlinux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: List-ID: We don't need to call btrfs_release_path because btrfs_free_path will do that for us. Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang --- fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c index 9351428..67fa2d2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c @@ -159,7 +159,6 @@ int btrfs_update_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root write_extent_buffer(l, item, ptr, sizeof(*item)); btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(path->nodes[0]); out: - btrfs_release_path(root, path); btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; } @@ -332,7 +331,6 @@ int btrfs_del_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, BUG_ON(refs != 0); ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path); out: - btrfs_release_path(root, path); btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; }