From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tracy Reed Subject: Re: [wiki] btrfs logo Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:23:59 -0800 Message-ID: <20091129022359.GX3222@tracyreed.org> References: <5f9f991c0911280530n62bbe9ffk92f0415f82b610a@mail.gmail.com> <934f64a20911280959w208cc751sc27302f1e8b3fdda@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ngiTnHdmUEG79yp6" Cc: Daniel Lommes , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: David Nicol Return-path: In-Reply-To: <934f64a20911280959w208cc751sc27302f1e8b3fdda@mail.gmail.com> List-ID: --ngiTnHdmUEG79yp6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:59:58AM -0600, David Nicol spake thusly: > Wah, it doesn't look like a stick of butter being sliced into hard > drive pats. Boo hoo. And thank god for that. Letting btrfs be known as "butterfs" (fat, greasy, slimy, unhealthy) instead of "betterfs" will be just one more in a long series of egregious marketing mistakes made by the FLOSS community. --=20 Tracy Reed http://tracyreed.org --ngiTnHdmUEG79yp6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLEds/9PIYKZYVAq0RAkY4AJ9IPnXZkO37+cjk5WoETOgy7aqVSgCfemqy /Pj2WT+++6aBJXYN9PtI62c= =csGj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ngiTnHdmUEG79yp6--