From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc2+ bug in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:672
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:35:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20100104093546.GA5699@Pilar.aei.mpg.de>
References: <20100102103227.GA3678@Pilar.aei.mpg.de>
 <20100102223416.GA6090@Pilar>
 <201001040122.36431.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
 <3d0408631001032020n10d82ea4x1ecde375bd46060a@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng " <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3d0408631001032020n10d82ea4x1ecde375bd46060a@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Mo  4.Jan'10 at 12:20:18 +0800, Yan, Zheng  wrote:

> > Sounds like the bug reported here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-
> > systems.btrfs/4332/match=btrfs+fails+randomly. Can you try the patch provided
> > in that thread?
> >
> I have sent a patch for this.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg03686.html

Thanks for pointing it out, my google search missed that report.

I am already testing that patch, and if you don't hear back from
me than all is fine.

Thanks again.