From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Subject: Re: btrfs volume mounts and dies (was Re: Segfault in btrfsck) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:52:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20100106075253.GA5665@cumulus> References: <1262476565.17096.20.camel@phat> <1262559421.17096.50.camel@phat> <1262565474.17096.68.camel@phat> <1262732153.4509.1.camel@phat> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Freitas Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1262732153.4509.1.camel@phat> List-ID: Hello Steve, Steve Freitas wrote (ao): > Should I take it by the lack of list response that I should just flush > this partition down the toilet and start over? Or is everybody either > flummoxed or on vacation? I don't have your original mail, but I think I remember you mentioned a lot of bad sectors on that disk reported by SMART. If that is indeed the case it might be dificult for the people who might be able to help you, to help you. Please ignore me if I confused your mail with another. With kind regard, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net