Hi,

On Tuesday 12 January 2010 08.08:26 Piavlo wrote:
> Maintaining snapshot hierarchy by  external application is not reliable
> and error prone
> compared to maintaining it withing the btrfs itself,
> probably by adding the parent treeid field for every  shapshot/subvolume.

What should, in your opinion, happen if the parent snapshot is deleted?  
Orphan? Re-parent to parent of parent?  I guess depending on application, 
there may be more than one "right" solution.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
When Al sends me patches, I apply them.
I worry what would happen if I didn't.
        -- Linus Torvalds