From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [patch]btrfs: finish read pages in the order they are submitted
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:18:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100203181845.GE22119@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100203074511.GA26548@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 03:45:11PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> the endio is done at reverse order of bio vectors. That means for a sequential
> read, the page first submitted will finish last in a bio. Considering we will
> do checksum (making cache hot) for every page, this does introduce delay (and
> chance to squeeze cache used soon) for pages submitted at the begining. I
> don't observe obvious performance difference with below patch at my simple test,
> but seems more natural to finish read in the order they are submitted.
Interesting, I wonder if we'd be able to see this on a higher throughput
system. Jens, care to give it a shot (patch below)?
-chris
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 96577e8..4df0c56 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1750,7 +1750,8 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct bio *bio, int err)
static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int err)
{
int uptodate = test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
- struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec_end = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec;
struct extent_io_tree *tree;
u64 start;
u64 end;
@@ -1773,7 +1774,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int err)
else
whole_page = 0;
- if (--bvec >= bio->bi_io_vec)
+ if (++bvec <= bvec_end)
prefetchw(&bvec->bv_page->flags);
if (uptodate && tree->ops && tree->ops->readpage_end_io_hook) {
@@ -1818,7 +1819,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int err)
}
check_page_locked(tree, page);
}
- } while (bvec >= bio->bi_io_vec);
+ } while (bvec <= bvec_end);
bio_put(bio);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-03 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 7:45 [patch]btrfs: finish read pages in the order they are submitted Shaohua Li
2010-02-03 18:18 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-02-08 10:59 ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-08 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100203181845.GE22119@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox