From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:43:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100205.224310.06173989.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100205.213220.147487541.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: lists@nerdbynature.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: From: Christian Kujau Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:28:47 -0800 (PST) > Hm, now it looks like this, but I don't know how it'd reveal more > information: > > [ 210.707051] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 210.802236] Caller [10101f1c:btrfs_csum_final+0x3c/0x60 [btrfs]] > [ 210.874620] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 210.969899] Caller [10101f1c:btrfs_csum_final+0x3c/0x60 [btrfs]] > [ 228.724982] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 228.820220] Caller [10101f1c:btrfs_csum_final+0x3c/0x60 [btrfs]] > [ 228.892286] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 228.987851] Caller [10101f1c:btrfs_csum_final+0x3c/0x60 [btrfs]] > > I'm open for more patches :-) Confusing for me too. I'll try to think about this some more.