From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wengang Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix how we freeze Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:39:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20100323153951.GC2733@laptop.oracle.com> References: <20100323142818.GB2381@localhost.localdomain> <20100323145408.GD2481@laptop.oracle.com> <20100323150357.GE2381@localhost.localdomain> <20100323152518.GA2733@laptop.oracle.com> <20100323152749.GF2381@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Wengang Wang , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Josef Bacik Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100323152749.GF2381@localhost.localdomain> List-ID: On 10-03-23 11:27, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:25:18PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > > On 10-03-23 11:03, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:54:08PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > If the only thing is returning 0 in the freeze/unfreeze member functions, why > > > > not just remove the two functions? > > > > > > > > > > Because if the fs doesn't provide a freeze/unfreeze function, trying to do a > > > freeze will return -EOPNOTSUPP, which is not what we want. Thanks, > > > > How does freeze_fs()/unfreeze_fs() get called in btrfs? I think they > > called by freeze_bdev()/unfreeze_fs() respectively. And I don't see > > -EOPNOTSUPP is returned in the later two functions. > > > > its in ioctl_fsfreeze, > > /* If filesystem doesn't support freeze feature, return. */ > if (sb->s_op->freeze_fs == NULL) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > Yes, it's there. Thanks for your explanation! regards, wengang.