linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Justin" <yoosty69@netzero.com>
To: chris.mason@oracle.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs Bug?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:10:55 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100409.201055.8629.0@webmail06.vgs.untd.com> (raw)

As far as I know TRIM was enabled. I didn't forcibly disable it and I'm under the assumption that btrfs enables it when an SSD is detected.


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Justin <yoosty69@netzero.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs Bug?
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 07:18:44 -0400

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:46:40PM +0000, Justin wrote:
> Unfortunately I did reformat.
> Actually, I did a complete zero-out of the drive with dd, and then I ran "badblocks -w" on the drive, which returned 0 bad blocks (not sure if this is really a good test for SSD's as there's some amount of internal voo-doo on the drive itself).
> 
> For future reference, how would I go about getting an image of the drive without being able to use btrfs-image?

Well, we'll have to fixup btrfs-image to make it more tolerant of
errors.  It needs options to skip corrupted sections of the btree and
encode what it can.

In this case, I would have had you run btrfs-map-logical, which will
just read the one bad block and save its contents.

We've had cases on ssd where every other byte was ff, so I was curious
how the bad block looked on your intel.

Were you running with trim enabled?

-chris



____________________________________________________________
Penny Stock Jumping 2000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/4bbfec7c95e751a3b6bst04vuc

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-10  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-10  3:10 Justin [this message]
2010-04-12 14:03 ` btrfs Bug? Chris Mason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-08 18:46 Justin
2010-04-09 11:18 ` Chris Mason
2010-04-07  0:37 yoosty69
2010-04-06 17:08 yoosty69
2010-04-08 14:04 ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100409.201055.8629.0@webmail06.vgs.untd.com \
    --to=yoosty69@netzero.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).