From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sean Bartell <wingedtachikoma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Restoring BTRFS partition
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:50:49 -0400
Message-ID: <20100420165049.GA6352@flcl.lan>
References: <w2y8c113a261004200756ucfa2eeabk617da0fc90d6ed8a@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100420155538.GB3634@laptop.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Alli Quaknaa <alquaknaa@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100420155538.GB3634@laptop.oracle.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:55:38PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> I guess the reason is that the 300M file btrfs and the one on your
> partition have different block size. Thus 65k zeros on your file image
> doesn't mean 65k on the partition. So maybe you will try with blocks
> instead of bytes.

Actually, the block size doesn't matter for this--the superblock is
always at 0x10000. Alli, I think you'll have to upload the start of the
partition so someone can take a look at it.