From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wengang Wang Subject: Re: Restoring BTRFS partition Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:49:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20100421024925.GA2252@laptop.oracle.com> References: <20100420155538.GB3634@laptop.oracle.com> <20100420165049.GA6352@flcl.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100420165049.GA6352@flcl.lan> List-ID: On 10-04-20 12:50, Sean Bartell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:55:38PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > > I guess the reason is that the 300M file btrfs and the one on your > > partition have different block size. Thus 65k zeros on your file image > > doesn't mean 65k on the partition. So maybe you will try with blocks > > instead of bytes. > > Actually, the block size doesn't matter for this--the superblock is > always at 0x10000. Alli, I think you'll have to upload the start of the > partition so someone can take a look at it. I see. Thanks all for my knowledge! regards, wengang.