linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO V2
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 17:10:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100506211012.GD2997@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100506190012.GB13974@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>

On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:00:13PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> V1->V2: Check to see if our current ppos is >= i_size after a short DIO read,
> just in case it was actually a short read and we need to just return.
> 
> This is similar to what already happens in the write case.  If we have a short
> read while doing O_DIRECT, instead of just returning, fallthrough and try to
> read the rest via buffered IO.  BTRFS needs this because if we encounter a
> compressed or inline extent during DIO, we need to fallback on buffered.  If the
> extent is compressed we need to read the entire thing into memory and
> de-compress it into the users pages.  I have tested this with fsx and everything
> works great.  Thanks,

This seems safe to me, but I'm a bit worried about potential breakages.
Did you test this with xfsqa on xfs and ext3/4 to make sure there are
no regressions?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06 19:00 [PATCH 1/3] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO V2 Josef Bacik
2010-05-06 21:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100506211012.GD2997@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).