From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Subject: Re: Rename+crash behaviour of btrfs - nearly ext3!
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20100518133940.GS14663@oak.highrise.ca>
References: <4BF18525.8080904@gmail.com> <20100517193652.GC8635@think> <4BF1DBCD.7060208@gmail.com> <20100518003032.GK8635@think> <20100518005926.GM8635@think> <4BF28225.2000908@gmail.com> <20100518131304.GX8635@think>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7L9kolmstoDTZ4pm"
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100518131304.GX8635@think>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>


--7L9kolmstoDTZ4pm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> [100518 09:13]:
 
> I'm more than open to discussion on this one, but I don't see how:

> Should be expected to write 1GB of data.

++

Please don't mess up BTRFS because older, less better things are messed
up in certain ways.  If we're just going to continually perpetuate the
ideas that broken-by-desing apps are "right", we might as well just give
up on a better FS, and stick to "what broken apps are expecting" (i.e.
ext3).


-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.

--7L9kolmstoDTZ4pm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFL8picuVxNPsxNPScRAjZNAJ9sreGxuhmvZkhk9De26BhGduYxBgCeIhYs
7IbynizXyhrTD8d0yVPzNYY=
=iesl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7L9kolmstoDTZ4pm--