* [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible()
@ 2010-07-26 8:27 Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kulikov Vasiliy @ 2010-07-26 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors; +Cc: Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel
worker_loop() uses schedule_timeout() without setting state to
STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called in cycle without checking of
pending signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible().
Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again:
* worker->working is still 1, so nobody
* is going to try and wake us up
*/
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
smp_mb();
if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) ||
!list_empty(&worker->prio_pending))
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible()
2010-07-26 8:27 [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() Kulikov Vasiliy
@ 2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie
2010-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miao Xie @ 2010-07-27 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kulikov Vasiliy
Cc: kernel-janitors, Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs,
linux-kernel
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:27:43 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> worker_loop() uses schedule_timeout() without setting state to
> STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called in cycle without checking of
> pending signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy<segooon@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again:
> * worker->working is still 1, so nobody
> * is going to try and wake us up
> */
> - schedule_timeout(1);
> + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
I found there is the same problem in the other place of the btrfs,
could you fix them?
Thanks!
Miao
> smp_mb();
> if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) ||
> !list_empty(&worker->prio_pending))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible()
2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie
@ 2010-07-27 17:46 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vasiliy Kulikov @ 2010-07-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miao Xie; +Cc: kernel-janitors, Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs,
linux-kernel
schedule_timeout() is used without setting state to
STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called without checking of pending
signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() instead.
Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 +++---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again:
* worker->working is still 1, so nobody
* is going to try and wake us up
*/
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
smp_mb();
if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) ||
!list_empty(&worker->prio_pending))
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 32d0940..5b55a20 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ again:
up_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);
mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
if (btrfs_transaction_in_commit(fs_info))
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
else
cond_resched();
goto again;
@@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ again:
node = rb_next(node);
}
spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
goto again;
}
out:
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ int btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(struct inode *inode, u64 num_bytes)
int ret;
if (btrfs_transaction_in_commit(root->fs_info))
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
num_bytes = ALIGN(num_bytes, root->sectorsize);
again:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index e56c72b..9ff49e5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ again:
}
if (found || test_range_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, orig_end,
EXTENT_DELALLOC, 0, NULL)) {
- schedule_timeout(1);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
goto again;
}
return 0;
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-27 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-26 8:27 [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie
2010-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).