* [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() @ 2010-07-26 8:27 Kulikov Vasiliy 2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Kulikov Vasiliy @ 2010-07-26 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel-janitors; +Cc: Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel worker_loop() uses schedule_timeout() without setting state to STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called in cycle without checking of pending signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(). Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again: * worker->working is still 1, so nobody * is going to try and wake us up */ - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); smp_mb(); if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) || !list_empty(&worker->prio_pending)) -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() 2010-07-26 8:27 [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() Kulikov Vasiliy @ 2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie 2010-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Miao Xie @ 2010-07-27 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kulikov Vasiliy Cc: kernel-janitors, Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:27:43 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote: > worker_loop() uses schedule_timeout() without setting state to > STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called in cycle without checking of > pending signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(). > > Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy<segooon@gmail.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again: > * worker->working is still 1, so nobody > * is going to try and wake us up > */ > - schedule_timeout(1); > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); I found there is the same problem in the other place of the btrfs, could you fix them? Thanks! Miao > smp_mb(); > if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) || > !list_empty(&worker->prio_pending)) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() 2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie @ 2010-07-27 17:46 ` Vasiliy Kulikov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Vasiliy Kulikov @ 2010-07-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miao Xie; +Cc: kernel-janitors, Chris Mason, Tejun Heo, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel schedule_timeout() is used without setting state to STATE_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE. As it is called without checking of pending signals, use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() instead. Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 +++--- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c index 7ec1409..54eb070 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ again: * worker->working is still 1, so nobody * is going to try and wake us up */ - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); smp_mb(); if (!list_empty(&worker->pending) || !list_empty(&worker->prio_pending)) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 32d0940..5b55a20 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ again: up_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem); mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex); if (btrfs_transaction_in_commit(fs_info)) - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); else cond_resched(); goto again; @@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ again: node = rb_next(node); } spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock); - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); goto again; } out: @@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ int btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(struct inode *inode, u64 num_bytes) int ret; if (btrfs_transaction_in_commit(root->fs_info)) - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); num_bytes = ALIGN(num_bytes, root->sectorsize); again: diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index e56c72b..9ff49e5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ again: } if (found || test_range_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, start, orig_end, EXTENT_DELALLOC, 0, NULL)) { - schedule_timeout(1); + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); goto again; } return 0; -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-27 17:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-07-26 8:27 [PATCH] btrfs: set task state with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() Kulikov Vasiliy 2010-07-27 3:41 ` Miao Xie 2010-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).