From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: why does btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"?
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:38:50 -0600
Message-ID: <20100803033850.GE28609@achilles.cocyt.us>
References: <AANLkTimca-wn6wDpENT9t8gTdgFzPXv3uzhtaaHeuySf@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ"
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimca-wn6wDpENT9t8gTdgFzPXv3uzhtaaHeuySf@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>


--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:27:32AM +0800, Wang Shaoyan wrote:
> As far as I know, btrfs comes from "btree file system", but why does
> btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"?

The same reason we pronounce "ext3" as "eks tee three" rather than "eee
eks tee three"- laziness. "btree file system" is two extra syllables of
inefficiency over "butter fs".

--=20
=2E O .   O . O   . . O   O . .   . O .
=2E . O   . O O   O . O   . O O   . . O
O O O   . O .   . O O   O O .   O O O

--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJMV49KAAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPQ4kH+QEGG0WNFWBffcpAWxIjdNSV
VKzF0/dEZ0MR+XV9hNKlw5f5gNGGcwavUNdu7COheXIwLdLYNNX3Lf6GCZoyIm5t
fWBQvxw5e9l6v9WBEOAAoW7QwLuNxHhV5tUI4v4sQMD7Kc5/fsgmU1gv8RKeRsV6
osRM/YmKH3BLv2MR72ZNto3GXx6xB9rIpi/ooWKjJh3WVq41wqn8dbys6Nt0tXZw
is0QJwcjLV471ncudlG2G4wMSH229ApZZ/9oxrYcwPyOjnARO04mGyNU5f8Oidkr
p0aoKEflBheRwnZaKjODVXbKO5+n5Lna/hYFLw5gF1eBmwTplF1Gnsr2j8ped2U=
=tKN4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ--