From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diego Calleja Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:25:47 +0200 Message-ID: <201008170025.47510.diegocg@gmail.com> References: <1281948382.1888.7.camel@chotu> <7222A6B8ACA37D4AA1AC37810C43E8A80F5FC5BC@mail.corp.imt-systems.com> Reply-To: diegocg@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: "Morten P.D. Stevens" , Chris Mason , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" To: Chris Ball Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Lunes, 16 de Agosto de 2010 17:45:29 Chris Ball escribi=F3: > Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix errors. > While Btrfs is stable on a stable machine, it is currently possibl= e > to corrupt a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes or > loses power. This will be fixed when the fsck tool is ready. But doesn't this happen only with cheap disks that don't honour barrier= s correctly? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html