linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35 performance results
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:33:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823193325.GJ26773@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C72C871.4040602@austin.ibm.com>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:13:53PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> This did not seem to help, in fact we regressed more with COW
> enabled.. One thing to note, the last 2 sets of runs in the history
> graphs were actually run by Keith and he used stock kernel trees.
> For my recreate, I pulled the latest btrfs-unstable which is based
> on a 2.6.34 tree. Should I retest this on stock 2.6.35?  The high
> time in btrfs_start_one_delalloc_inode still exists.

btrfs-unstable or .35 are both fine.

Is this a fresh mkfs or are you reusing an existing tree?

> 
> Full results can be found here:
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/perftest/perfpatch/perfpatch.html
> 
> 128 thread random write test that shows the problem:
> 
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/perftest/perfpatch/perfpatch_Large_file_random_writes._num_threads=128.html

Ok, thanks, I'll try again.

-chris


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-06 18:44 2.6.35 performance results Steven Pratt
2010-08-06 18:58 ` Chris Mason
2010-08-16 20:04 ` Chris Mason
2010-08-16 21:51   ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-19  1:00     ` Chris Mason
2010-08-21 15:25       ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-23 19:13         ` Steven Pratt
2010-08-23 19:33           ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-08-23 20:10             ` Steven Pratt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-08  4:18 A. James Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823193325.GJ26773@think \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).