From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xavier Nicollet Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100826085801.GQ1344@jeru.org> References: <1281948382.1888.7.camel@chotu> <20100816121658.GT3315@think> <7222A6B8ACA37D4AA1AC37810C43E8A80F5FC5BC@mail.corp.imt-systems.com> <201008251857.39585.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> Reply-To: nicollet@jeru.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201008251857.39585.johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> List-ID: Le 25 ao=FBt 2010 =E0 18:57, Johannes Hirte a =E9crit: > > the other big question is: > > Is btrfs with 2.6.36 really rockstable and ready to use in producti= ve environments? >=20 > I don't think so. There is at least one checksum bug and ENOSPC probl= ems are also still present. I am planning to put 2 dedicated web hosting servers in production (backuped every day), with 2.6.34.5 vanilla kernel. I also use btrfs on a 2.6.34 kernel on the backup server (rsync) for some time. --=20 Xavier Nicollet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html