From: Sean Bartell <wingedtachikoma@gmail.com>
To: Yuehai Xu <yuehaixu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, yhxu@wayne.edu, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: BTRFS && SSD
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:59:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100929195929.GA5588@lelouch.nomadic.ncsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTind3szR8RjBLPbKb2yMH-s8q2ti+28N38z1BeTj@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Yuehai Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Sean Bartell <wingedtachikoma@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:30:14AM -0400, Yuehai Xu wrote:
> >> I know BTRFS is a kind of Log-structured File System, which doesn't do
> >> overwrite. Here is my question, suppose file A is overwritten by A',
> >> instead of writing A' to the original place of A, a new place is
> >> selected to store it. However, we know that the address of a file
> >> should be recorded in its inode. In such case, the corresponding part
> >> in inode of A should update from the original place A to the new place
> >> A', is this a kind of overwrite actually? I think no matter what
> >> design it is for Log-Structured FS, a mapping table is always needed,
> >> such as inode map, DAT, etc. When a update operation happens for this
> >> mapping table, is it actually a kind of over-write? If it is, is it a
> >> bottleneck for the performance of write for SSD?
> >
> > In btrfs, this is solved by doing the same thing for the inode--a new
> > place for the leaf holding the inode is chosen. Then the parent of the
> > leaf must point to the new position of the leaf, so the parent is moved,
> > and the parent's parent, etc. This goes all the way up to the
> > superblocks, which are actually overwritten one at a time.
>
> You mean that there is no over-write for inode too, once the inode
> need to be updated, this inode is actually written to a new place
> while the only thing to do is to change the point of its parent to
> this new place. However, for the last parent, or the superblock, does
> it need to be overwritten?
Yes. The idea of copy-on-write, as used by btrfs, is that whenever
*anything* is changed, it is simply written to a new location. This
applies to data, inodes, and all of the B-trees used by the filesystem.
However, it's necessary to have *something* in a fixed place on disk
pointing to everything else. So the superblocks can't move, and they are
overwritten instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 15:30 BTRFS && SSD Yuehai Xu
2010-09-29 17:08 ` Sean Bartell
2010-09-29 18:45 ` Yuehai Xu
2010-09-29 19:59 ` Sean Bartell [this message]
2010-09-29 21:31 ` Yuehai Xu
2010-09-30 7:15 ` Sander
2010-09-30 12:06 ` Yuehai Xu
2010-09-30 13:45 ` Sander
2010-09-30 7:51 ` David Brown
2010-09-30 12:04 ` Yuehai Xu
2010-09-29 19:39 ` Aryeh Gregor
2010-09-29 20:08 ` Sean Bartell
[not found] ` <20100929173757.7cf18c0d@simplux>
2010-09-29 18:38 ` Yuehai Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100929195929.GA5588@lelouch.nomadic.ncsu.edu \
--to=wingedtachikoma@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhxu@wayne.edu \
--cc=yuehaixu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).